Michigan
In April of 1868, Joseph Workman attempted to enroll his biracial son into a school. The school denied the boy because of his race. Workman filed a lawsuit with the Michigan Supreme Court. He had many supporters including a group of civil rights activists, the Second Baptist Church, future Governor John J. Bagley, and Fannie Richards (Detroit’s first Black teacher). Workman claimed that a state law, requiring equal access to any school in a district, applied to Detroit and Black students. The Detroit Board of Education argued that this legislation did not apply because “There exists among a large majority of the white population of Detroit a strong prejudice or animosity against colored people, which is largely transmitted to the children in the schools, and this feeling would engender quarrels and contention if colored children were admitted to the white schools.”
Justice Campbell's opinion. Again just claims it's about legality stating: The question involved is purely one of law, and cannot properly be allowed to become involved in any complications of policy.
If the board of education have the control over the arrangement and classification of the schools, which they have heretofore exercised, their action cannot be judicially revised. If they have exceeded their powers, the excess can be restrained, and the writ applied for is the proper process." Concludes by saying: "But if the law of 1867 was, as I conceive it to have been, entirely inapplicable, then it had no force one way or the other, and the board of education must act on their own judgement and responsibility in determining how long they should adhere to their present policy; and any change must depend upon their decision. I think there is no case made for relief."
Case presented, H. M. & W. E. Cheever, for relator and D. B. & H M. Duffield for respondents. Majority opinion written by Justice Thomas M. Cooley.
Involves admitting a child of color into a public school. Claim the father is entitled to ascertain the right. It was objected that child did not show necessary qualifications for admission. Finishes
by saying "that the board having made the child’s color the sole objection, the relator, if this fails, is presumptively entitled to the writ."
Involves admitting a child of color into a public school. Claim the father is entitled to ascertain the right. It was objected that child did not show necessary qualifications for admission. Finishes by saying "that the board having made the child’s color the sole objection, the relator, if this fails, is presumptively entitled to the writ."