Ohio

Van Camp

vs

Board

In the 1850s in Ohio, some people believed that those with mixed-race ancestry should share the same rights afforded to fully-white citizens. Enos Van Camp had a distant Black ancestor, but he considered himself and his family to be white. He had two school-age children living in his home (his son and an apprentice). On February 5, 1855, Van Camp applied to the Board of Education of the Incorporated Village of Logan to have the two children admitted to one of the common schools in the district. The Board refused to accept them. Van Camp took this case to the District Court of Hocking County. He argued the boys were white and should be admitted.  The Board of Education argued that Van Camp, his wife, his son, and his apprentice were all Black, not only by blood but also by physical appearance. The Board further claimed their schools were established for white children and that there was no school for Black students because there were not enough students. The Court ruled in favor of the Board. Van Camp appealed the case to the Supreme Court of Ohio. This Court referred to the Ohio statute of March 14, 1853, which stated that the education of all youth, white and “colored,” must be in separate schools. They agreed with the lower court’s ruling and said that the law is one of classification, not of exclusion. Because the children both had some Black “blood,” they were considered "colored" or Black, and could not attend white schools. [253 words]

Further Reading

Collection

Full of Sumner's writings. Section titled: The Word "White." He discusses the hypocrisy of courts in defining "white." Refers to case (Lake v. Baker et al) in which "a child of Negro, Indian, and whit

e blood" was "entitled to the benefits of the common-school fund" because child was more than half-white (regarding blood quantums). Brings up Van Camp v. Board, stating: Yet in a later case the same court decided that “children of three-eighths African and five-eighths white blood, but who are distinctly colored, and generally treated and regarded as colored children by the community where they reside, are not, as of right, entitled to admission into the common schools set apart for the instruction of white youths.” Unhappy children! Even five-eighths white blood could not save them, if in their neighborhood they were known as “colored.”

Webpage

Biography page of former Ohio Justice, William Virgil Peck. Primarily disucsses his career and summerizes the case.